Foreign Policy

US Disaster Relief Effort for Hurricane Melissa Under Scrutiny Amid Agency Overhaul

By Economics Desk | October 29, 2025

As Hurricane Melissa devastates Caribbean neighbors, the US pledges relief—but dismantling of key agencies and government shutdown raise critical questions about true readiness and commitment.

The United States has announced plans to send several dozen disaster relief workers, including urban search and rescue teams, to assist Caribbean nations battered by Hurricane Melissa. While this rapid deployment sounds like decisive action, a closer look reveals troubling vulnerabilities in America’s capacity to lead effective humanitarian missions abroad—vulnerabilities rooted in Washington’s recent upheavals.

Can America Deliver When It Counts?

The storm tore through Jamaica, Cuba, Haiti, and the Bahamas leaving death and destruction in its wake. The response includes Disaster Assistance Response Team (DART) personnel from Washington and Miami hubs alongside specialized rescue units from California and Virginia. Yet those who monitor federal disaster response know that dismantling the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID)—once the backbone of such operations—risks sowing confusion and delays. State Department officials attempt reassurance, stating the dismantling won’t hinder aid efforts and that furloughs from the government shutdown won’t affect critical personnel. But can bureaucratic restructuring and political brinkmanship not weaken America’s ability to project power through kindness?

America First Means Strong Sovereignty Backed by Real Capacity

This situation underscores a broader challenge: American leadership abroad depends on robust institutions unhampered by partisan dysfunction. With USAID sidelined and military involvement still under review by Southern Command, questions loom over operational effectiveness at a time when regional stability directly impacts our national security interests.

Our southern hemisphere neighbors are vital buffers against illicit trafficking networks that threaten our borders—something President Trump’s administration rightly prioritized by bolstering military presence in the Caribbean.

Yet disaster relief also represents soft power projection essential to maintaining goodwill. The Pentagon’s cautious stance on troop deployment may reflect prudence but also highlights how piecemeal coordination might undermine swift humanitarian assistance—no small matter when each hour means lives lost or saved.

Moreover, no evacuation plans have been announced despite thousands of Americans residing or traveling in the affected areas—a vulnerability that should prompt serious contingency planning early rather than later.

For Americans concerned with freedom, security, and responsible stewardship of taxpayer dollars, these developments demand scrutiny. Effective aid is not just charity—it protects American families by stabilizing neighboring countries crucial to our homeland defense.

If we truly champion national sovereignty and economic prosperity as pillars of America First policy, investing in competent disaster response mechanisms must be non-negotiable—not just lofty promises during crises but a consistent priority backed by functional institutions.