UN Security Council to Convene Amid U.S. Military Operation in Venezuela, Raising Alarms on Global Stability

On Monday, the United Nations Security Council will convene an emergency session following the unprecedented U.S. airstrike inside Venezuela that resulted in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores. This high-stakes move by Washington, confirmed by President Donald Trump as a “successful large-scale attack,” represents a significant assertion of American power aimed at restoring lawful governance in a nation long ruled by tyrannical leadership hostile to both its people and U.S. interests.

While critics within the UN machinery—backed by globalist powers such as Russia and China—label this intervention as “a dangerous precedent,” it’s crucial to understand that America’s decisive action targets not just corrupt foreign regimes but serves to protect our hemisphere’s security and economic future.

Is the UN Protecting Sovereignty or Shielding Authoritarianism?

The push by Colombia and support from permanent members Russia and China to hold this meeting exposes a familiar pattern: international bodies often prioritize geopolitical agendas over genuine respect for national sovereignty and democratic principles. The Venezuelan regime’s own ambassador condemned the attack as “colonial war” seeking to impose a puppet government—a narrative designed to obscure decades of authoritarian abuses and economic plunder under Maduro’s rule.

This conflict is not merely about Venezuela; it’s about preserving stability on our doorstep amid rising regional threats exacerbated by socialist mismanagement and corruption. For too long, Washington has hesitated to act decisively against regimes undermining freedom and prosperity in Latin America. The recent operation demonstrates an application of America First principles—assertive defense of national interests coupled with support for liberty abroad.

What Does This Mean for American Families and National Security?

The ramifications extend beyond diplomatic posturing at UN headquarters. By neutralizing a regime that fosters instability, narcotrafficking, and mass migration crises, the United States protects its borders from escalating illegal flows that strain communities across our nation. Furthermore, reclaiming control over Venezuela’s vast natural resources aligns with bolstering energy independence—a top priority for economic liberty.

Yet, questions remain: How long will international institutions serve as shields for oppressive governments rather than champions of freedom? How long will Washington tolerate bureaucratic resistance when bold action can make America—and our neighbors—safer?

Ultimately, this development demands vigilance from all Americans who value national sovereignty over globalist interference. It’s time to hold those who obstruct true progress accountable while standing behind policies that defend our freedoms both at home and abroad.