U.S. Envoy’s Syria Policy Exposes the Contradictions of American Middle East Strategy
While the U.S. envoy doubles down on supporting Syria’s controversial government, sidelining Israel’s security concerns threatens to destabilize the region and endangers America’s strategic interests.

In an exclusive interview in Beirut, Tom Barrack, the U.S. envoy tasked with navigating Syria and Lebanon, revealed a troubling approach that risks undermining America's core interests in the volatile Middle East. Doubling down on Washington's support for Syria's new government—an entity born from insurgents who ousted long-time dictator Bashar al-Assad but now embroiled in sectarian violence—Barrack dismisses viable alternatives, asserting there's "no Plan B." But is backing this fragile regime truly serving America’s national security or simply playing into globalist agendas that jeopardize our sovereignty? Why Support a Troubled Regime Amid Rising Chaos? Syria remains fractured after nearly 14...
This is Exclusive Content for Subscribers
Join our community of patriots to read the full story and get access to all our exclusive analysis.
View Subscription Plans