Military Affairs

The Military Backbone Behind Olympic Biathlon: An Overlooked Pillar of National Strength

By National Security Desk | February 19, 2026

Far from a simple winter sport, biathlon’s roots in military training reveal how America’s patriots balance competition with service, securing national strength and personal futures beyond athletics.

The story of biathlon is not just about skiing fast or shooting straight; it is a living testament to the enduring bond between military readiness and athletic excellence. Rooted deeply in Scandinavian military patrol exercises, biathlon remains inseparable from the discipline, precision, and resilience honed in armed service.

How Military Service Fuels America’s Biathlon Edge

At the heart of Team USA’s biathlon squad, you find warriors wearing dual hats as soldiers and athletes. Staff Sgt. Deedra Irwin, Spc. Sean Doherty, and Spc. Maxime Germain from the Vermont National Guard exemplify this fusion—training rigorously at Camp Ethan Allen Training Site equipped with specialized mountain warfare facilities and dedicated biathlon ranges.

Doherty’s words echo a critical truth: military support extends far beyond physical training—it provides security and resources that empower athletes to push boundaries without fearing for their future livelihoods. Such integration reflects an America First principle—our nation prioritizes its defenders by investing in their multifaceted success rather than leaving them vulnerable post-competition.

International Parallels Reveal a Model Worth Preserving

The U.S. is not alone in leveraging this military-athletic synergy. French gold medalists Lou Jeanmonnot and Éric Perrot serve as sergeants in their Army; Italy’s Lisa Vittozzi earns her Olympic laurels backed by the Italian Army’s sports program; Germany ensures lifelong careers for biathletes within police or military ranks after retirement.

This system does more than produce champions; it safeguards athletes against economic uncertainty inherent in elite sports where prize money is scarce early on. Former German Olympian Arnd Peiffer emphasizes the importance of job security—a lesson Washington should heed when considering how best to support Americans who serve both on fields of battle and snow-covered trails.

Contrast this with Norway and Sweden—countries dominant in biathlon but lacking robust military-athlete integration—and a key question arises: how does distancing sport from service impact national resilience? The American model stands as a beacon of strategic foresight that benefits not only individual competitors but also America’s broader defense posture.

As global tensions rise, nurturing citizens capable of both defending freedom and exemplifying American excellence on world stages matters profoundly. Ignoring this vital link risks weakening our national fabric at home while adversaries exploit every advantage abroad.

Biathlon’s legacy teaches us that defending liberty sometimes means blending tradition with modern opportunity—supporting our troops who compete fiercely today so they remain pillars of strength tomorrow.