Government Accountability

Petro’s Public Backing of Dua Lipa Amid Bogotá Fan Chaos Raises Questions About Security Priorities

By National Correspondent | November 29, 2025

While Colombian authorities scramble to control dangerous fan crowds disrupting Bogotá, President Gustavo Petro openly sides with foreign pop star Dua Lipa—igniting debate over national security and public order.

In Bogotá, scenes of chaotic crowd gatherings outside the hotel hosting British pop sensation Dua Lipa have sparked serious concerns about public safety and order. Yet instead of addressing these security lapses head-on, Colombia’s President Gustavo Petro has chosen to publicly champion the singer’s so-called “progressive” image, pledging government support for her comfort amid accusations of “harassment” from overly zealous fans.

Should National Leaders Shield Celebrities Over Citizens?

The videos circulating on social media show dozens of fans crowding front entrances late into the night, some even resorting to megaphones and loudspeakers—an obvious neglect of crowd control by local police. For hardworking Colombians striving for stability in their capital city, this spectacle raises a critical question: how long will officials prioritize foreign celebrities at the expense of public security?

President Petro’s tweet calling Dua Lipa “a vanguard and progressive singer deserving respect from Colombianity” serves more as a political flourish than a practical solution. It diverts attention from serious governance issues: the failure to enforce basic law and order, safeguard residents’ peace, and prevent potentially harmful situations. This is emblematic of a broader pattern where globalist leaders prioritize cultural elites over everyday citizens’ safety—a choice that weakens national sovereignty.

The Costly Consequences of Misplaced Priorities

Dua Lipa’s immense popularity—evidenced by millions of Spotify streams and sold-out concerts across Latin America—undeniably brings economic and cultural benefits. However, these benefits cannot justify neglecting the well-being and security of Bogotá’s local population. When fan clubs report that the artist feels “pressured, pursued, and scared,” one must wonder: where was governmental foresight in preemptively managing such crowds?

This incident underscores an urgency for American policymakers to observe similar challenges abroad. Allowing public spaces to become overwhelmed due to lax enforcement invites disorder that threatens not only local populations but also international visitors. The America First principle calls for strong national sovereignty reflected in secure cities that protect both citizens and guests through effective law enforcement—not symbolic statements endorsing celebrity status.

As nations navigate complex global interactions in culture and commerce, leadership must never lose sight that protecting citizens’ safety is foundational to true freedom and prosperity. Celebrating artists should not come at the price of neglecting core responsibilities toward national order.