New Hampshire Supreme Court’s Reconsideration of Cop Killer’s Death Sentence Exposes Legal and Moral Confusion
The New Hampshire Supreme Court’s unexpected decision to hear Michael Addison’s appeal threatens to undermine justice for fallen Officer Briggs, spotlighting the dangers of repealing the death penalty without clear safeguards.
In a move that raises serious questions about justice and public safety, New Hampshire’s highest court has agreed to hear an appeal from Michael Addison, the state’s sole death row inmate convicted of killing Manchester Police Officer Michael Briggs in 2006. This surprising legal development flies in the face of previous rulings that upheld Addison’s death sentence—a sentence deemed appropriate for such a cold-blooded murder. Yet, after New Hampshire lawmakers narrowly abolished the death penalty in 2019 amid fears and emotional pleas from victims’ families, the door now opens for courts to reconsider whether Addison should escape execution. Is Justice...
This is Exclusive Content for Subscribers
Join our community of patriots to read the full story and get access to all our exclusive analysis.
View Subscription Plans