Government Accountability

Federal Judge Sanctions Lawyers for Fabricating Cases Using AI in Alabama Prison Litigation

By Patriot News Investigative Desk | July 25, 2025

A federal judge slams high-priced attorneys defending Alabama’s prison system for reckless use of fabricated ChatGPT case citations, exposing deeper problems in legal accountability.

The integrity of our legal system — a cornerstone of American freedom and justice — is under siege. In Birmingham, Alabama, a federal judge has taken the rare and necessary step of sanctioning three lawyers from the prestigious Butler Snow firm for submitting court filings riddled with completely fabricated case citations generated by artificial intelligence.

U.S. District Judge Anna Manasco did not mince words when she condemned the lawyers’ conduct as “recklessness in the extreme.” The head of the firm’s prison litigation division, William R. Lunsford, along with Matthew B. Reeves and William J. Cranford, now face removal from the case, mandatory disclosure of sanctions across all their cases, and a referral to the Alabama State Bar for disciplinary review.

Is This Carelessness or a Dangerous Abuse of Justice?

What does this episode tell us about those entrusted with defending government institutions? Butler Snow has received over $40 million since 2020 to represent Alabama in lawsuits tied to its troubled prison system — lawsuits that allege officials are failing to protect inmates from violence and unsafe conditions. Yet instead of defending these claims with truthful legal arguments grounded in precedent, these lawyers turned to AI-generated fabrications.

This raises urgent questions: How can we trust a justice system where attorneys rely on unverified machine-generated fiction? How long will Washington turn a blind eye to such erosion of credibility within public defense teams backed by taxpayer dollars? When government contractors prioritize cutting corners over upholding law and order, American families pay the price.

Protecting National Sovereignty Requires Holding Our Legal System Accountable

The reckless use of ChatGPT—an unvetted tool ill-suited for nuanced legal research—undermines national sovereignty by weakening state authority and judicial fairness. When courts are fed falsehoods disguised as law, it shakes public confidence not only in local governance but also in our broader commitment to rule of law that keeps America free.

This incident is emblematic of larger systemic failures where bureaucracy and corporate law firms exploit taxpayer funds without delivering accountability or results. The America First principle demands that defenders of our institutions act with integrity and common sense—qualities conspicuously absent here.

As citizens concerned about preserving individual liberty and national strength, we must demand transparency and strict consequences for those who manipulate justice rather than uphold it.

The question remains: Will state authorities enforce discipline vigorously enough to deter future abuses? Or will such reckless behavior become normalized behind closed legal doors? The future safety of Alabama’s prisons—and by extension American justice—depends on answers now.