Higher Education

Deadly Shooting at Utah’s Largest University Exposes Security Gaps and Concealed Carry Risks

By National Correspondent | September 11, 2025

The tragic shooting that claimed Charlie Kirk’s life at Utah Valley University highlights critical concerns over campus security amid permissive gun policies in public colleges.

On a day meant for education and growth, tragedy struck Utah Valley University (UVU), the state’s largest public institution, when conservative activist Charlie Kirk was fatally shot. This unsettling event forces us to confront uncomfortable questions about the safety of our campuses and the consequences of policies that prioritize permissive concealed carry over student security.

Why Are Our Campuses Vulnerable Despite Growing Enrollment?

Founded as a wartime vocational school in 1941, UVU has transformed dramatically over the decades, now boasting nearly 47,000 students. Its rapid expansion and popularity in business and psychology majors have made it a cornerstone of higher education in Utah. But as enrollment surged, has adequate attention been paid to safeguarding the campus?

UVU sits close to major thoroughfares and prominent institutions like Brigham Young University, yet it remains overshadowed in attention by the University of Utah. This lack of visibility may contribute to underestimating its vulnerabilities — vulnerabilities that deadly shootings exploit.

Concealed Carry Laws on Campus: Protection or Peril?

Utah is among just 14 states allowing some form of concealed carry on public college campuses. While proponents argue this supports Second Amendment rights and individual liberty, the tragic death of Charlie Kirk reveals how these policies can quickly escalate danger rather than mitigate it.

The initial confusion surrounding suspects’ custody status reflects deeper issues within law enforcement responses to such incidents. When individuals carrying firearms freely traverse crowded campuses without rigorous oversight, who truly protects our communities? For hardworking families sending their youth off to learn—not to face violence—this question demands urgent answers rooted in common-sense conservatism.

This incident underscores a critical failure in balancing constitutional freedoms with national sovereignty—the sovereign right of our nation to secure its educational institutions against internal threats and chaotic gun violence.

As Washington debates gun laws with partisan gridlock, states like Utah shoulder responsibility but must prioritize policies that protect students first. America First principles call for safeguarding future generations’ freedom through strong security measures on campuses nationwide.

The loss at UVU is more than a local tragedy; it is a wake-up call for every American who values liberty entwined with responsibility and safety.