College Sports Settlement Faces Early Crisis Over NIL ‘Valid Business Purpose’ Definition
Less than two weeks after a landmark college sports settlement launched, a sharp conflict over NIL collectives and the definition of a “valid business purpose” threatens to derail progress, exposing deep legal confusion that risks harming student-athletes and the integrity of collegiate athletics.
Just days after a multibillion-dollar college sports settlement promised new freedom for athletes to monetize their name, image, and likeness (NIL), bureaucratic red tape is already choking that promise. The newly formed College Sports Commission (CSC) has drawn a line in the sand, rejecting deals from NIL collectives whose only function is to pay players — declaring these arrangements lack a “valid business purpose.” This move is more than a mere technicality; it strikes at the heart of how young athletes are allowed to benefit from their own hard work. According to the CSC’s recent letter to athletic directors, collectives...
This is Exclusive Content for Subscribers
Join our community of patriots to read the full story and get access to all our exclusive analysis.
View Subscription Plans