Club World Cup Attendance Exposes FIFA’s Overreach and Mismanagement
FIFA’s grand vision for the Club World Cup is faltering as empty stadiums in key U.S. venues reveal a failure to connect with soccer fans, exposing costly missteps by international governing bodies.

The much-hyped FIFA Club World Cup, launched with ambitions to elevate global club soccer in the United States, has instead spotlighted a stark reality: disengaged fans and poorly executed event planning. Despite FIFA President Gianni Infantino’s glowing claims of the tournament becoming “the undisputed pinnacle of global club football,” attendance figures tell a vastly different story.
In Orlando’s Inter&Co Stadium—one of the smallest chosen venues—rows upon rows of vacant seats greeted matches between lesser-known teams such as Mamelodi Sundowns and Ulsan HD. With less than 1,000 fans present in a venue that holds over 25,000, it resembled the desolate scenes familiar only during pandemic lockdowns. Even after ticket prices were slashed dramatically to just $23, local interest remained negligible.
This failure highlights FIFA’s ongoing disconnect from the American sports market where competition is fierce and consumer dollars are hard-won. The choice to stage elite global soccer matches featuring unfamiliar clubs in sprawling stadiums without generating grassroots enthusiasm or affordable access was destined for poor turnout.
Contrast this with marquee matchups involving globally recognized teams like Paris Saint-Germain and Atletico Madrid, which drew over 80,000 spectators at Los Angeles’ Rose Bowl. Yet even established Premier League giant Chelsea could muster only 22,000 fans in a massive Atlanta stadium during weekday afternoon hours against an MLS team — another glaring sign that mere big names alone cannot guarantee success without genuine fan engagement.
Despite FIFA congratulating itself on selling 1.5 million tickets overall and averaging around 36,000 per game in these early stages, such numbers mask critical weaknesses: uneven attendance patterns reflect sporadic interest influenced heavily by star power rather than sustainable support for the tournament format or host cities.
What This Means for America First
From an America First perspective, this event underscores how foreign-run organizations like FIFA often prioritize their own agendas over understanding American consumers and preserving our national sporting identity. Inflated ticket prices paired with inconsistent marketing alienate working-class families who underpin true sports culture here at home.
Moreover, staging international events across sprawling venues disconnected from local communities serves neither economic empowerment nor cultural enrichment but rather bloated spectacles designed for globalist branding rather than American vitality.
A Call for Accountability
The U.S., preparing to host next year’s men’s World Cup—a mammoth event under scrutiny itself—should demand higher standards from international governing bodies. We must insist on transparency about attendance figures and meaningful measures that actually grow interest domestically rather than inflating statistics with mismatched venues and overpriced tickets.
FIFA must be held accountable for its failures to respect American sports consumers and traditions. The so-called “Club World Cup” flopped not due to lack of love for soccer but from poor strategic planning driven by globalist ambitions detached from reality on the ground.
It is time Americans push back against bureaucrats who treat our country merely as a marketplace rather than embracing our sovereignty over how sporting events should succeed here — ensuring access, affordability, and authentic community support are front and center.