Foreign Policy

President Trump reveals the death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei in a coordinated US-Israel strike, exposing the regime’s tyranny and opening a critical moment for American national security and Middle East stability.

A coordinated U.S. and Israeli military strike killed over 200, possibly including Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. This bold action exposes the dangers of globalist appeasement and underscores the need for America First policies to restore stability.

Ex-Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa calls the US blockade on Cuba ‘criminal’ yet warns any attempt at military invasion would spiral into a costly quagmire akin to Vietnam.

Through official images and public appearances, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei reveals himself as the unyielding force behind Tehran’s destabilizing policies—posing a clear challenge to American security and interests.

As reports emerge of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s death following U.S. and Israeli strikes, we examine his iron grip on Iran and what this means for American national security and regional stability.

As the U.S. and Israel strike high-value Iranian targets, understanding Tehran’s leadership hierarchy reveals the stakes for America’s national security and why vigilance remains critical.

UN Secretary-General Guterres calls for an immediate ceasefire amid Middle East tensions but fails to recognize Iran’s role in threatening regional—and American—security.

Despite heavy U.S.-Israel strikes on Iranian soil, Tehran confirms Supreme Leader Khamenei is alive while tensions escalate dangerously in the Middle East, raising urgent questions about America’s strategic readiness.

Iran’s retaliatory missile attacks on U.S. bases and Israel reveal the consequences of flawed American policies and insufficient regional strategy, threatening our national security and sovereignty.

EU leaders call for restraint amid escalating US-Israel strikes on Iran, but fail to address the regime’s direct threat to America’s security. How long will Western bureaucrats prioritize diplomatic niceties over decisive action against Tehran’s nuclear ambitions?