UK Government’s China Strategy: Caught Between Economic Dependency and Security Risks
Despite rising espionage and democratic interference from China, the UK government refuses to treat Beijing as a full threat, prioritizing trade over true national security.

The recent UK government “China audit” reveals a troubling contradiction at the heart of British foreign policy. On one hand, officials openly acknowledge China’s escalating attempts at espionage, destabilization, and economic disruption against the United Kingdom. On the other, they continue to emphasize China as an indispensable economic partner, refusing to designate it as a threat on par with Russia.
Foreign Secretary David Lammy bluntly admitted that “China’s power is an inescapable fact,” stressing that freezing relations is “not an option.” Yet this stance dangerously underestimates the severity of China’s actions. The audit itself confirms increased instances of spying and interference targeting British democracy and economic security—clear indicators of hostile intent from Beijing.
Economic Gains or Security Losses?
The UK views China as its third largest trading partner and a key source of international students for its universities. However, placing economic interests above national security risks is short-sighted. China’s global ambitions are aligned with undermining Western democracies and expanding authoritarian influence—actions directly antithetical to Britain’s freedom and sovereignty.
Moreover, downplaying China’s threat status ignores how Beijing tacitly supports Russia’s aggression in Ukraine while continuing aggressive policies in Hong Kong that trample human rights. These developments should raise alarms about relying on China economically without stringent safeguards.
Political Debate Reveals Divisions
Opposition voices within the UK Parliament sharply criticize the government’s approach. Former Foreign Affairs spokeswoman Priti Patel warns of governmental naivety toward China’s intentions. Conservative lawmaker Harriet Cross brands Beijing “at best unreliable and at worst hostile.” Such dissent highlights growing concern among conservatives who champion protecting Britain’s sovereignty over appeasing Beijing for short-term economic benefits.
A Call for Clear-Sighted Policy
The UK’s so-called “hardening” of national security strategy must translate into concrete measures prioritizing defense against covert Chinese operations—not just aspirational pledges to boost spending by 2035. A nation’s survival depends on vigilance over strategic competitors like China who seek leverage through infiltration rather than transparent diplomacy.
Ultimately, Britain must choose between true national sovereignty—defending its institutions against foreign meddling—and maintaining fragile economic ties that embolden autocratic regimes at home and abroad.
This report uncovers uncomfortable truths mainstream narratives avoid: economic partnership with China comes at a steep cost if it compromises freedom and democracy inside the United Kingdom.