Gun Policy

Colorado School Shooting: Parents Cleared, but Systemic Security Failures Demand Accountability

By National Correspondent | February 5, 2026

After a tragic school shooting in Colorado, authorities decline charges against parents despite serious questions about gun access and radicalization — highlighting glaring gaps in national security and parental accountability.

The recent tragedy at Evergreen High School in Colorado, where 16-year-old Desmond Holly wounded two students before taking his own life, leaves more questions than answers about how our communities protect children from lethal violence. The Jefferson County Sheriff’s Office announced no charges will be filed against Holly’s parents for gun negligence, yet this decision underscores critical failures in safeguarding firearms and monitoring dangerous radical influences.

Where Is the Line Between Parental Responsibility and Public Safety?

The family insists that the revolver used by Holly was locked away securely, an old Smith & Wesson .38 special stored inside a large, locked gun safe—a family heirloom reportedly accessed only briefly by the father. Despite this claim, investigators found insufficient evidence to charge the parents with negligence or illegal storage because they lacked the necessary proof of parental enabling. But is it enough to rely solely on DNA tests or claims when a minor not only obtained but wielded a deadly weapon to terrorize classmates?

This gap in enforcement points directly to a broader failure: America faces an urgent need for commonsense policies that ensure guns are truly inaccessible to children who might be driven toward destruction. While Washington dithers over ideological debates, families endure the consequences—another community traumatized, another chance missed to protect innocent lives through enforcing responsible gun ownership.

Radicalization Left Unchecked: A National Security Blind Spot

Further troubling is the revelation that Desmond Holly had been influenced by extremist online networks and obsessed with prior mass shootings like Columbine. Yet official investigations describe his radicalization as unclear or uncommitted to any specific ideology. How can we trust these vague conclusions when we know extremists exploit digital platforms unchecked? The FBI’s reticence to release information prevents public understanding of how such individuals slip through cracks amid growing online hatred and violent content.

When youth absorb toxic ideologies without intervention, it threatens not only their communities but national sovereignty itself. Radicalization fuels division and chaos within our borders—while Washington prioritizes globalist distractions over securing our domestic frontlines.

America First demands robust accountability—from parents who must secure firearms beyond doubt; from law enforcement agencies that should rigorously pursue negligence; from federal authorities charged with combating extremism at its roots. Our children deserve nothing less than peace of mind knowing their schools are safe havens. Can we accept anything else?