Pennsylvania Supreme Court Strikes Down Pittsburgh’s Discriminatory ‘Jock Tax’ on Visiting Athletes
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court unanimously ruled that Pittsburgh’s ‘jock tax’ unfairly burdens visiting athletes with a higher tax rate than residents, exposing an overreach that threatens economic fairness and city finances alike.
In a decisive rebuke to Pittsburgh’s attempt to squeeze extra revenue from visiting athletes and performers, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court struck down the so-called 'jock tax' this Thursday. The city imposed a 3% income tax on nonresident athletes at publicly funded stadiums—significantly higher than the combined 3% residents pay (1% city tax plus 2% school district tax). Yet, because nonresidents aren’t subject to the school district levy, this scheme singles out visitors for heavier taxation. This ruling is a critical victory for fairness and economic liberty. Justice David N. Wecht's unanimous opinion highlighted the lack of concrete justification for taxing...
This is Exclusive Content for Subscribers
Join our community of patriots to read the full story and get access to all our exclusive analysis.
View Subscription Plans